Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

GST Implementation in India: Pros, Cons and Overview, Study notes of Finance

An overview of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) implementation in India, discussing its pros and cons. The document also includes statistics on GST collections and the impact on economic growth. useful for university students studying economics, finance, or business, as well as lifelong learners interested in tax reforms.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

gerrard
gerrard 🇮🇹

3.9

(7)

213 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Whether this system has been the game changer that it
has always been touted to be is yet to be seen. Hence,
for the moment, we will focus only on its widely debat-
ed pros and cons.
II.BRIEF HISTORY OF GST IN INDIA:
The idea of moving towards GST was first mooted by
the then Union Finance Minister in his Budget speech
for 2006-07. Initially, it was proposed that GST would
be introduced from 1st April 2010.The Empowered
Committee of State Finance Ministers (EC) which had
formulated the design of State VAT was requested to
come up with a roadmap and structure for GST. Joint
Working Groups of officials having representatives of
the States as well as the Centre were set up to examine
various aspects of GST and draw up reports specifical-
ly on exemptions and thresholds, taxation of services
and taxation of inter-State supplies. Based on discus-
sions within and between it and the Central Govern-
ment, the EC released its First Discussion Paper (FDP)
on the GST in November, 2009. This spelt out features
of the proposed GST and has formed the basis for dis-
cussion between the Centre and the States so far.
The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST)
is a very significant step in the field of indirect tax re-
forms in India. By amalgamating a large number of Cen-
tral and State taxes into a single tax, GST will mitigate
ill effects of cascading or double taxation in a major
way and pave the way for a common national market.
From the consumers point of view, the biggest advan-
tage would be in terms of reduction in the overall tax
burden on goods, which is currently estimated to be
around 25%-30%. It would also imply that the actual bur-
den of indirect taxes on goods and services would be
much more transparent to the consumer. Introduction
of GST would also make Indian products competitive in
the domestic and international markets owing to the
full neutralization of input taxes across the value chain
of production and distribution. Studies show that this
would have a boosting impact on economic growth.
Last but not the least, this tax, because of its trans-
parent and self-policing character, would be easier to
administer. It would also encourage a shift from the
informal to formal economy.
Cite this article as: Mrs. Archana Shah, “Pros and Cons of
GST in India-An Overview”, yuva Engineers, Volume 7 Issue
9, 2018, Page 4-9.
Volume No: 7 (2018), Issue No: 9 (August) ISSN No: 2320-3706
Volume No: 7 (2018), Issue No: 9 (August) ISSN No: 2320-3706
Abstract:
GST is stated to be one of the biggest tax reforms in In-
dia; it is the only indirect tax that directly affects all sec-
tors and sections of our economy. The GST bill, known
as the Goods and Services Tax, The tax came into effect
from July 1, 2017 through the implementation of One
Hundred and First Amendment of the Constitution of
India by the Modi government. It is being described
as the game changer of the Indian economy due to
its sweeping impact on the businesses in India. GST in
India is the replacement of all previous taxes on the
goods and services. It is an indirect tax that will take
over all previous taxes. There are many challenges be-
fore the government for its implementation, success
and proper benefit gain. This paper reviews the pros
and cons associated with GST after its implementation.
It is found that there is a serious challenge faced by the
industry and businesses is the shift from the previous
tax regime into the Input tax credit of the GST. Many
people in the economy are struggling to get adapted
to the destination based tax of GST.
Keywords:
GST, reforms, tax, business, India, economic growth.
I.INTRODUCTION:
India is the second largest consumer market in the
world. There are over a billion consumers, and com-
panies from all over the world are making inroads into
this developing nation to get a piece of the action. The
Indian growth story has been remarkable and resilient.
It has been resilient because the growth has happened
despite the unfavorable business atmosphere in the
nation. Companies have always found it difficult to
cope with the incredibly complex and harrowing tax-
ation system that India had put into place. However,
on the midnight of 30th June 2017, India woke up to a
new tax regime. From 1st July 2017, the various taxes
that were levied by different state and local authorities
were scrapped. A new system was created, the result
of which was a unified tax system that would work all
across the nation. The principle followed during the im-
plementation was “One nation, One market, One tax
“This was no less than a historic moment. This is be-
cause various Indian governments have been involved
in a massive parliamentary debate for over 15 years on
this issue of GST. Finally, the system has seen the light
of day.
Mrs. Archana Shah
Vice-Principal,
Radhe Krishna Women’s College,
Char Kaman, Ghansi Bazaar, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500066, India.
YUVA ENGINEERS
| AUGUST 2018 Page 4
Pros and Cons of GST in India-An Overview
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download GST Implementation in India: Pros, Cons and Overview and more Study notes Finance in PDF only on Docsity!

Whether this system has been the game changer that it has always been touted to be is yet to be seen. Hence, for the moment, we will focus only on its widely debat- ed pros and cons.

II.BRIEF HISTORY OF GST IN INDIA:

The idea of moving towards GST was first mooted by the then Union Finance Minister in his Budget speech for 2006-07. Initially, it was proposed that GST would be introduced from 1st April 2010.The Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers (EC) which had formulated the design of State VAT was requested to come up with a roadmap and structure for GST. Joint Working Groups of officials having representatives of the States as well as the Centre were set up to examine various aspects of GST and draw up reports specifical- ly on exemptions and thresholds, taxation of services and taxation of inter-State supplies. Based on discus- sions within and between it and the Central Govern- ment, the EC released its First Discussion Paper (FDP) on the GST in November, 2009. This spelt out features of the proposed GST and has formed the basis for dis- cussion between the Centre and the States so far. The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a very significant step in the field of indirect tax re- forms in India. By amalgamating a large number of Cen- tral and State taxes into a single tax, GST will mitigate ill effects of cascading or double taxation in a major way and pave the way for a common national market. From the consumers point of view, the biggest advan- tage would be in terms of reduction in the overall tax burden on goods, which is currently estimated to be around 25%-30%. It would also imply that the actual bur- den of indirect taxes on goods and services would be much more transparent to the consumer. Introduction of GST would also make Indian products competitive in the domestic and international markets owing to the full neutralization of input taxes across the value chain of production and distribution. Studies show that this would have a boosting impact on economic growth. Last but not the least, this tax, because of its trans- parent and self-policing character, would be easier to administer. It would also encourage a shift from the informal to formal economy. Cite this article as: Mrs. Archana Shah, “Pros and Cons of GST in India-An Overview”, yuva Engineers, Volume 7 Issue 9, 2018, Page 4-9.

Abstract:

GST is stated to be one of the biggest tax reforms in In- dia; it is the only indirect tax that directly affects all sec- tors and sections of our economy. The GST bill, known as the Goods and Services Tax, The tax came into effect from July 1, 2017 through the implementation of One Hundred and First Amendment of the Constitution of India by the Modi government. It is being described as the game changer of the Indian economy due to its sweeping impact on the businesses in India. GST in India is the replacement of all previous taxes on the goods and services. It is an indirect tax that will take over all previous taxes. There are many challenges be- fore the government for its implementation, success and proper benefit gain. This paper reviews the pros and cons associated with GST after its implementation. It is found that there is a serious challenge faced by the industry and businesses is the shift from the previous tax regime into the Input tax credit of the GST. Many people in the economy are struggling to get adapted to the destination based tax of GST.

Keywords:

GST, reforms, tax, business, India, economic growth.

I.INTRODUCTION:

India is the second largest consumer market in the world. There are over a billion consumers, and com- panies from all over the world are making inroads into this developing nation to get a piece of the action. The Indian growth story has been remarkable and resilient. It has been resilient because the growth has happened despite the unfavorable business atmosphere in the nation. Companies have always found it difficult to cope with the incredibly complex and harrowing tax- ation system that India had put into place. However, on the midnight of 30th June 2017, India woke up to a new tax regime. From 1st July 2017, the various taxes that were levied by different state and local authorities were scrapped. A new system was created, the result of which was a unified tax system that would work all across the nation. The principle followed during the im- plementation was “One nation, One market, One tax “This was no less than a historic moment. This is be- cause various Indian governments have been involved in a massive parliamentary debate for over 15 years on this issue of GST. Finally, the system has seen the light of day.

Mrs. Archana Shah

Vice-Principal, Radhe Krishna Women’s College, Char Kaman, Ghansi Bazaar, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500066, India.

Pros and Cons of GST in India-An Overview

thresholds, taxes to be subsumed and other matters. One-half of the total number of members of GSTC form quorum in meetings of GSTC. Decision in GSTC is taken by a majority of not less than three-fourth of weighted votes cast. Centre has one-third weightage of the total votes cast and all the states taken together have two- third of weightage of the total votes cast. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a vast concept that simplifies the giant tax structure by supporting and enhancing the economic growth of a country. GST is a comprehen- sive tax levy on manufacturing, sale and consumption of goods and services at a national level. On bringing GST into practice, there is an amalgamation of Central and State taxes into a single tax payment. It would also enhance the position of India in both, domestic as well as international market. At the consumer level, GST aims to reduce the overall tax burden, which is current- ly estimated at 25-30%. Under this system, the consum- er pays the final tax but an efficient input tax credit sys- tem ensures that there is no cascading of taxes- tax on tax paid on inputs that go into manufacture of goods. All decisions taken by the GST Council has been arrived at through consensus. The option of exercising a vote has not been resorted to till date. To ensure smooth roll-out of the GST, various Committees and Sectoral groups has been formed comprising of members from both Centre and States. Taxes at the Centre and State level are being subsumed into GST

At the Central level, the following taxes are

being subsumed:

  1. Central Excise Duty,
  2. Additional Excise Duty,
  3. Service Tax,
  4. Additional Customs Duty commonly known as Coun- tervailing Duty, and
  5. Special Additional Duty of Customs.

At the State level, the following taxes are be-

ing subsumed:

  1. Subsuming of State Value Added Tax/Sales Tax,
  2. Entertainment Tax (other than the tax levied by the local bodies), Central Sales Tax (levied by the Centre and collected by the States),
  3. Octroi and Entry tax,
  4. Purchase Tax,
  5. Luxury tax, and
  6. Taxes on lottery, betting and gambling.

IV. DISCUSSION

PROS AND CONS OF GST IMPLEMENTATION

IN INDIA

(Pros/Advantages) :

  1. GST is expected to build a more transparent and cor- ruption-free tax system in India. The government proposes to introduce GST with ef- fect from 1st July 2017.

III.GST AND CENTRE-STATE FINANCIAL RELA-

TIONS:

Currently, fiscal powers between the Centre and the States are clearly demarcated in the Constitution with almost no overlap between the respective domains. The Centre has the powers to levy tax on the manu- facture of goods (except alcoholic liquor for human consumption, opium , narcotics etc.) while the States have the powers to levy tax on sale of goods. In case of inter-states sales, the Centre has the powers to levy a tax (the Central Sales Tax) but, the tax is collected and retained entirely by the originating States. As for services, it is the Centre alone that is empowered to levy Service Tax. Since the States are not empowered to levy any tax on the sale or purchase of goods in the course of their importation into or exportations from India, the Centre levies and collects this tax in addition to the Basic Customs Duty. Introduction of GST required amendments in the Con- stitution so as to empower the Centre and the States concurrently to levy and collect GST.The assignment of concurrent jurisdiction to the Centre and the States for the levy of GST required a unique institutional mecha- nism that would ensure that decisions about the struc- ture, design and operation of GST are taken jointly by the two. To address all these and other issues, the Con- stitution (122nd Amendment) Bill was introduced in the 16th Lok Sabha on 19.12.2014. The Bill provides for a levy of GST on supply of all goods or services except alcohol for human consumption. The tax shall be lev- ied as Dual GST separately, but concurrently the Union (CGST) and the States (SGST). The Parliament would have exclusive power to levy GST (IGST) on inter state trade or commerce (including imports) in goods and services. The Central Government will have the power to levy excise duty in addition to GST, on tobacco and tobacco products. The constitution Amendment Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha in May, 2015. The Bill with certain amend- ments was finally passed in the Rajya Sabha and there- after by the Lok Sabha in August, 2016. Further, the Bill has been ratified by the required number of States and has since received the assent of the President on 8th September, 2016 and has been enacted as the 101st Constitution Amendment Act, 2016. The GST Council has also been notified w.e.f. 12th September, 2016. GST Council is being assisted by a Secretariat. The Goods and Service Tax Council (hereinafter referred to as, “GSTC”) comprises of the Union Finance Minister, the Minister of State (Revenue) and the State Finance Min- isters to recommend on the GST rate, exemption and

It also stated that India’s plan to have central GST (CGST) and state GST (SGST) has some resemblance to the structure of the system existing in the Canadian province of Quebec where independent federal (GST) and provincial (QST) VATs are operative simultaneous- ly. Figure No: 2 Figure No: 3

VII.FINDINGS:

  1. The RBI report suggested that a robust and fail- proof information technology (IT) framework is an es- sential prerequisite for the success of the GST, given the large volume of transactions involved.
  2. It is also important to sensitize the industry and pub- lic through information dissemination such as release of legislative documents and conducting outreach pro- grammes/media interactions with the tax authorities. The tax laws need to be simplified to avoid definitional issues and defray administrative costs, the report add- ed.
  3. Referring to lessons from implementation of GST from other countries, it said that a well-designed goods and services tax should ensure that, A single rate is levied on a comprehensive base (goods and ser- vices); no exemptions are given beyond standard ones; GST refunds are processed expeditiously; an adequate threshold is delineated to exclude small and micro busi- ness; and initial rates are suitably calibrated to avoid disruptions to economic activity and macroeconomic stability.
  4. Businesses are required to have separate registra- tions for multiple business entities in different states. It will increase the burden of tax compliance.
  5. GST has reduced the tax revenue of some states as they are now required to share revenues with the cen- tral government.
  6. The tax will be paid by the end consumer, which makes it a non-consumer-friendly tax system.

V.METHODOLOGY:

The data taken for this study is secondary in nature from the reports and websites of government and pri- vate Organizations.

VI.DATA PRESENTATION:

The international experience of GST implementation shows that tax authorities and government may need to be careful about issues around tax evasion such as small businesses not registering; under-reporting of actual sales by traders; traders reducing their liability by exaggerating the proportion in the lower tax slabs; traders collecting tax but not remitting to the govern- ment; and traders making false claims for refunds. Figure No: 1 The report prepared by the Fiscal Analysis Division of the Department of Economic and Policy Research (DEPR) at RBI, however, also highlighted several mer- its of GST implementation. While on the one hand, it is likely to strengthen cooperative federalism and have far-reaching implications for growth, inflation, public finances and external competitiveness in the Indian economy, it is may also bolster states’ revenue and anchor fiscal consolidation without compromising on expenditure quality. India has proposed an initial rate of 15 per cent (average of standard rates – 12 and 18 per cent approved by GST Council), the average VAT/GST rate in major OECD countries is higher than the rate proposed for India and those prevailing among other emerging market economies (EMEs) in 2016.

12.Even for December, there could be an impact of opening credit(transitional credit) claim for which the last date is Dec. 27.

  1. GST collections slid for the second straight month to Rs85,174 crore in February as only 69% of the asses- sees filed returns.
  2. Around 59.51 lakh GSTR 3B returns were filed for February. This is 69% of the total taxpayers who are re- quired to file the monthly returns.
  3. The total revenue received under GST for the month of February 2018 (received up to 26 March) has been Rs85,174 crore , said the finance ministry.
  4. The GST collections in January stood at Rs86, crore, while in December and November it was Rs88,929 crore and Rs83,716 crore. 17.Till 25 March, 1.05 crore taxpayers had been regis- tered under GST. Of these, 18.17 lakh are composition dealers who are required to file returns every quarter and the rest, 86.37 lakh, are required to file returns ev- ery month.
  5. Of the Rs85,174 crore GST collections in February, Rs14,945 crore has been garnered as Central GST and Rs 20,456 crore as State GST. Besides, Rs42,456 crore has been collected as Integrated GST and Rs7,317 crore as compensation cess. A total amount of Rs25, crore is being transferred from IGST to CGST/SGST ac- count by way of settlement.
  6. Thus, the total collection of CGST and SGST up to 26th March (for February) is Rs27,085 crore and Rs33,880 crore respectively, including transfers by way of settlement.
  7. According to a finance ministry reply to the Lok Sabha, GST collections were Rs93,590 crore in July, Rs93,029 crore in August, Rs95,132 crore in September and Rs85,931 crore in October. 21.The next big hope for the government would be the introduction of GST e-way bills with effect from 1 April, which may provide a boost to GST collections. After the e-way bill rollout, transporters of goods worth over Rs50,000 will have to generate an e-way bill. The e-way bill, which would be required to be presented to a GST inspector if asked for, is being touted as an anti-eva- sion measure and would help boost tax collections by clamping down on trade that currently happens on cash basis.
  8. It has been a matter of debate for couple of years now as to what kind of impact GST may have on the average growth, the report states that the average growth in some advanced economies increased by about 0.7 percentage point following fiscal (includ- ing tax) reforms. “As it promotes competitiveness, efficiency gains from GST are considered to be higher vis-a-vis other taxes, the benefits of which accrue to growth over the medium-term.
  9. Even from a fiscal perspective the international ev- idence suggests that implementation of VAT/ GST has resulted in a higher government revenue-GDP ratio over time. An earlier study concluded that the tax-GDP ratio increased significantly after VAT implementation in twelve European countries. Moreover, OECD data on member countries from Europe suggest an increase of 37 per cent in the VAT revenues-GDP ratio between 1975 and 2006 (OECD, 2008).
  10. Of the total mop-up for November, Rs. 13,089 crore came from Central GST, Rs 18,650 crore from State GST, Rs 41,270 crore as Integrated GST and Rs 7, crore as compensation cess. 53.06 lakh returns were filed for the month of November till Dec. 25.
  11. From the IGST collection, Rs 10,348 crore has been transferred to the CGST account, while Rs 14,488 crore is being transferred from IGST to SGST account by way of settlement of funds on inter-state business to cus- tomer transactions.
  12. The downward trend in GST revenue is a cause for concern. Though the reasons can be attributed to low- ering of rates in mid-November, the expansion of tax base and buoyancy due to rate reduction should have ideally checked the dip in collections.
  13. The GST Council, in its Oct. 23 meeting, lowered rates on more than 200 items, most of which were brought to 18 percent from the highest 28 percent. The new slabs came into effect on Nov. 15.
  14. The government had attributed the low October collection to the delay in introducing electronic way bills, reverse-charge mechanism—where recipients of goods and services pay tax instead of suppliers—and invoice matching that were meant to increase compli- ance. The GST Council has rolled out e-way bills for the movement of goods between states.
  15. The dip in revenue is along expected lines given that rates of over 200 items were reduced from Nov. 15 and refunds to exporters were initiated recently.