

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The enduring impact of the classical management approach on modern project management. Topics include roles and responsibilities, processes, resource management, work identification, planning vs execution, and the limited influence of bureaucracy. References include cole & kelly's 'management theory and practice' and taylor's 'principles of scientific management'.
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Although it has been years since the Classical Management Approach has been defined, it stills shows a strong influence on today’s Project Management field. In its theoretical principles, project management always concerned with the roles and responsibilities identification, processes, policies, and procedures. In practice, applying these principles with some modification (Tailoring) is crucial to achieve projects’ success. In addition, managing resources, including human resources, is a very important part of management in the projects. It includes management of teams, training individuals, and finding different ways that could motivate each team member. The term the ‘systemic analysis of work’ defined by Frederick Tylor (1911), is what can be referred to in the project management by work identification that includes many steps, starting by defining scope, creating work breakdown structure for the planned work, and then drilling down to the level of activities that reflects the day to day work by project team. Not only that, but also putting a frame of the correcting time and method that should be utilised is part of the planning too. These steps are the building blocks for each project, as due to the temporary nature of the projects, it cannot leave any part of work to be subjected to the “rule of thumb”, otherwise, the project is promising to be failure. However, the separation of controlling and planning from the work execution is taking place in project management to some extent. As project managers are responsible of planning the overall project stages and tasks, the team managers also have some degree of freedom in planning their part of work the way that could deliver the required products, and then they should take approval from their managers. Regarding Bureaucracy in management, it is also reflected but to a very small extent in the project management, as dehumanize the work may show some forms of rigidity that will not suite the changing nature of projects. In addition, the strategic drift that could happen as a result of Bureaucracy, will lead the project work to be considered as failure if it does not achieve its strategic objective. Moreover, as dealing with the Bureaucratic nature of some governmental organisation will hinder the project work, it has been defined in the project management as a Functional Organisation, that should be identified since the beginning of the project in order to define the ways to obtain the required authority in each stage or step. As a conclusion, as I have summarised above, the classical management approach is still having strong influence and proves its appropriateness to the universal project management roles that are applicable nowadays,based on the global best practices. Reference:
Cole. G. A. and Kelly, P. (2016) Management Theory and Practice (Custom Edition), Cengage. Taylor, F.W. (1911/ Digitised 2005)The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Row, New York