Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Classical Management Approach and Its Influence on Project Management, Essays (university) of Leadership and Team Management

The enduring impact of the classical management approach on modern project management. Topics include roles and responsibilities, processes, resource management, work identification, planning vs execution, and the limited influence of bureaucracy. References include cole & kelly's 'management theory and practice' and taylor's 'principles of scientific management'.

Typology: Essays (university)

2019/2020

Uploaded on 07/10/2020

ahmed-nosehy
ahmed-nosehy 🇬🇧

9 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Although it has been years since the Classical Management Approach has been
defined, it stills shows a strong influence on today’s Project Management field. In its
theoretical principles, project management always concerned with the roles and
responsibilities identification, processes, policies, and procedures. In practice, applying
these principles with some modification (Tailoring) is crucial to achieve projects’
success. In addition, managing resources, including human resources, is a very
important part of management in the projects. It includes management of teams,
training individuals, and finding different ways that could motivate each team member.
The term the ‘systemic analysis of work’ defined by Frederick Tylor (1911), is what can
be referred to in the project management by work identification that includes many
steps, starting by defining scope, creating work breakdown structure for the planned
work, and then drilling down to the level of activities that reflects the day to day work by
project team. Not only that, but also putting a frame of the correcting time and method
that should be utilised is part of the planning too. These steps are the building blocks for
each project, as due to the temporary nature of the projects, it cannot leave any part of
work to be subjected to the “rule of thumb”, otherwise, the project is promising to be
failure.
However, the separation of controlling and planning from the work execution is taking
place in project management to some extent. As project managers are responsible of
planning the overall project stages and tasks, the team managers also have some
degree of freedom in planning their part of work the way that could deliver the required
products, and then they should take approval from their managers.
Regarding Bureaucracy in management, it is also reflected but to a very small extent in
the project management, as dehumanize the work may show some forms of rigidity that
will not suite the changing nature of projects. In addition, the strategic drift that could
happen as a result of Bureaucracy, will lead the project work to be considered as failure
if it does not achieve its strategic objective. Moreover, as dealing with the Bureaucratic
nature of some governmental organisation will hinder the project work, it has been
defined in the project management as a Functional Organisation, that should be
identified since the beginning of the project in order to define the ways to obtain the
required authority in each stage or step.
As a conclusion, as I have summarised above, the classical management approach is
still having strong influence and proves its appropriateness to the universal project
management roles that are applicable nowadays,based on the global best practices.
Reference:
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Classical Management Approach and Its Influence on Project Management and more Essays (university) Leadership and Team Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Although it has been years since the Classical Management Approach has been defined, it stills shows a strong influence on today’s Project Management field. In its theoretical principles, project management always concerned with the roles and responsibilities identification, processes, policies, and procedures. In practice, applying these principles with some modification (Tailoring) is crucial to achieve projects’ success. In addition, managing resources, including human resources, is a very important part of management in the projects. It includes management of teams, training individuals, and finding different ways that could motivate each team member. The term the ‘systemic analysis of work’ defined by Frederick Tylor (1911), is what can be referred to in the project management by work identification that includes many steps, starting by defining scope, creating work breakdown structure for the planned work, and then drilling down to the level of activities that reflects the day to day work by project team. Not only that, but also putting a frame of the correcting time and method that should be utilised is part of the planning too. These steps are the building blocks for each project, as due to the temporary nature of the projects, it cannot leave any part of work to be subjected to the “rule of thumb”, otherwise, the project is promising to be failure. However, the separation of controlling and planning from the work execution is taking place in project management to some extent. As project managers are responsible of planning the overall project stages and tasks, the team managers also have some degree of freedom in planning their part of work the way that could deliver the required products, and then they should take approval from their managers. Regarding Bureaucracy in management, it is also reflected but to a very small extent in the project management, as dehumanize the work may show some forms of rigidity that will not suite the changing nature of projects. In addition, the strategic drift that could happen as a result of Bureaucracy, will lead the project work to be considered as failure if it does not achieve its strategic objective. Moreover, as dealing with the Bureaucratic nature of some governmental organisation will hinder the project work, it has been defined in the project management as a Functional Organisation, that should be identified since the beginning of the project in order to define the ways to obtain the required authority in each stage or step. As a conclusion, as I have summarised above, the classical management approach is still having strong influence and proves its appropriateness to the universal project management roles that are applicable nowadays,based on the global best practices. Reference:

Cole. G. A. and Kelly, P. (2016) Management Theory and Practice (Custom Edition), Cengage. Taylor, F.W. (1911/ Digitised 2005)The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Row, New York