Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Evolutionary social psychology , Lecture notes of Social Psychology

used for my exam - good extra readings

Typology: Lecture notes

2015/2016

Uploaded on 04/06/2016

Lans1994
Lans1994 🇬🇧

4

(1)

1 document

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 2 Evolutionary Social Psychology: Justin Park
Parent caregiver attachment. Parental responses to child are kinship mechanisms e.g. mothers
sensitivity to proximity seeking behaviours. Must provide secure base to allow child engage in non-
attachment behaviours. RESULTS in differing attachment styles of infant e.g. secure, avoidant,
ambivalent (anxious). Shapes relationships later on e.g. ambivalent-anxious tend to difficult forming
secure romantic relationships, jealous tendencies, negative view of self. Avoidant are dismissive of
relationships and mistrust individuals.
Then we have secondary attachments i.e. sibling attachments. If secure then healthy development. If
do not make these attachments then maladaptive consequences including incest.
The quality of interactions with the attachment figure predicts individual differences in
attachment system functioning
SECURE SIBLING ATTACHMENT – form of secondary attachment
INTRO
DARWIN: individuals vary in phenotypes, some reproductively more successful, therefore
next generation made from these adaptations
Animal’s behaviour can be explained in terms of Darwin’s organising principle: evolution by
natural selection e.g. imprinting in geese (Lorenz). However using evolution to explain the
behaviour of humans can result in misunderstandings
Humans do what they do because of
Culture: We conform to societal norms
Learning: we do what we’ve learnt (from parents)
Intelligence: we rationally make plans and carry them out
Psychologists care because humans are animals who've evolved with physical
and psychological adaptations - we need evolutionary explanation to completely
answer psychological questions because other explanations: learning, culture,
intelligence are bi-products of evolution
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
Coming up with an adaptive explanation, or ‘just so story’: does NOT suffice
“Beyond just so stories”: DEBRUINE 2005 – Poor evolutionary
psychology focuses on ‘inventing’ adaptive functions for observed
behaviour. Good evolutionary psychology uses established biological
theories to predict patterns of behaviour that otherwise wouldn’t have
been investigated by non-evolution minded researchers.
E.g. masculine men tend to be healthier than feminine men. Penton-
Voak (1999) asked women to judge attractiveness of male face at 2
different points in menstrual cycle. Least fertile stage, preferred feminine
faces. Most fertile preference for feminine only half as strong.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Evolutionary social psychology and more Lecture notes Social Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 2 Evolutionary Social Psychology: Justin Park

Parent caregiver attachment. Parental responses to child are kinship mechanisms e.g. mothers sensitivity to proximity seeking behaviours. Must provide secure base to allow child engage in non- attachment behaviours. RESULTS in differing attachment styles of infant e.g. secure, avoidant, ambivalent (anxious). Shapes relationships later on e.g. ambivalent-anxious tend to difficult forming secure romantic relationships, jealous tendencies, negative view of self. Avoidant are dismissive of relationships and mistrust individuals.

Then we have secondary attachments i.e. sibling attachments. If secure then healthy development. If do not make these attachments then maladaptive consequences including incest.

The quality of interactions with the attachment figure predicts individual differences in

attachment system functioning

SECURE SIBLING ATTACHMENT – form of secondary attachment

INTRO

  • DARWIN: individuals vary in phenotypes, some reproductively more successful, therefore next generation made from these adaptations
  • Animal’s behaviour can be explained in terms of Darwin’s organising principle: evolution by natural selection e.g. imprinting in geese (Lorenz). However using evolution to explain the behaviour of humans can result in misunderstandings
  • Humans do what they do because of
    • Culture: We conform to societal norms
    • Learning: we do what we’ve learnt (from parents)
    • Intelligence: we rationally make plans and carry them out
      • Psychologists care because humans are animals who've evolved with physical and psychological adaptations - we need evolutionary explanation to completely answer psychological questions because other explanations: learning, culture, intelligence are bi-products of evolution

EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY

  • Coming up with an adaptive explanation, or ‘just so story’: does NOT suffice
    • “Beyond just so stories”: DEBRUINE 2005 – Poor evolutionary psychology focuses on ‘inventing’ adaptive functions for observed behaviour. Good evolutionary psychology uses established biological theories to predict patterns of behaviour that otherwise wouldn’t have been investigated by non-evolution minded researchers.
  • E.g. masculine men tend to be healthier than feminine men. Penton- Voak (1999) asked women to judge attractiveness of male face at 2 different points in menstrual cycle. Least fertile stage, preferred feminine faces. Most fertile preference for feminine only half as strong.

■ CE - However hard to generalise findings as Japanese, only 3 9 participants and mean age 21 years

INTRO: ATTRACTION TO FAMILIAR/SIMILAR

  • Many social psychology textbooks state that attraction occurs between familiar and similar others for 3 main reasons: PMS - Proximity effect: Frequent encounters promote relationships - Mere exposure effect: Exposure promotes preference - Similarity attraction effect: Greater similarity promotes attraction

■ Based on these effects we'd expect siblings to be attracted to each other because they typically have similar: values, behaviour, beliefs and appearance

■ LIMIT OF SOCIAL APPROACH = cannot answer fundamental question- Why siblings are not sexually attracted to each other

NEED EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE:

  • suggests instead we must specify precisely what we mean by “familiar” and “similar” - familiarity and similarity suggesting kinship should both increase and decrease attraction: increasing liking, decrease sexual ( PARK ET AL. 2008 )

Psychological adaptation: INCEST AVOIDANCE - ability to distinguish between close genetic kin and non-kin.

  • Genetic kinship serves adaptive function because:
    • Inbreeding costly – offspring likely to possess deficits so less likely to survive: important in order to maintain genetic fitness. So hypothesised aversion towards siblings
    • Genetic kin predicts altruism will occur more readily towards family members because it is advantageous to look after carriers of your genes. So hypothesised evolved tendency affection to maintain non-sexual altruism (PARK ET AL 2008)
  • Thus animals must somehow detect genetic relatedness using recognition mechanisms – 2 Heuristics: simple rules that work most of the time but can lead to errors - 1) Familiarity mechanisms ■ (In animals follow first thing you see: imprinting in waterfowl) ■ E.g. LIEBERMAN ET AL 2007 hypothesised kinship should lead to altruism and sexual aversion mediated by disgust. Used a survey to look at
    1. Westermarck effect : early life co-residence reduces sexual attraction EVEN to non kin e.g. minor marriages involve: an early engagement and co-residence of young children which occurs in certain countries.

■ Such couples exhibit: lower fertility, more affairs, higher rates of divorce

  • Evidence suggests aversions develop during an early sensitizing period mediated olfactorily - to their scents
    1. BEVC AND SILVERMAN (2000) heuristics fail to activate in presence of actual kinship - cases of siblings raised apart later marrying or having children
  • The study surveyed 170 subjects. Respondents reporting sexual acts with siblings were compared to respondents reporting no post-childhood sibling sexual behaviour. FOUND: prolonged separation during early childhood was associated with procreative post-childhood sexual activity.
  • SUGGESTS: being attracted due to similar traits without the disgust mechanism that would have resulted from childhood co-residence

■ (^) CE – correlational can’t infer cause and effect i.e. prolonged separation in childhood may not be sole cause of later sexual contact – could be due to many other variables. Plus self-report issues

EVIDENCE AGAINST EVOLVED INCEST AVOIDANCE: Pinker on Freud

Some argue presence of incest taboo around world = evidence people’s sexual desire for kin must be suppressed e.g. Freud: Oedipus complex desire to sex with parent. But it’s not like we were taught not to have sex with our siblings!

Pinker out ‘Freuded’ Freud in his response to Freud’s intimate erotic reaction to watching his mother change = Freud may have believed in incest because he was raised by a wet nurse: which may have reduced the kinship cues.

Fraley 2012 - FOUND: people find others more sexually attractive if they have just been subliminally exposed to an image of their opposite-sex parent. SUGGESTS: incest avoidance arises from consciously acknowledged taboos, and that when awareness of the kin relationship is bypassed, people find individuals who resemble their kin more sexually appealing.

Rantala 2013: FOUND: men - similarity to sibling in morphed images increased perceived attractiveness. Women rated faces that resemble their siblings as significantly lower in sexual attractiveness than morphed faces on average, and the opposite effect was found in SUGGESTS: sex differences as females bear greater costs associated with inbreeding depression, perhaps explaining their deeper aversion toward engagement in sexual activities with male individuals who bear cues to relatedness.

In sum

  • Evolutionary reasoning led to hypotheses that humans possess an incest-avoidance mechanism and a kin-altruism mechanism which require kin-recognition mechanisms - = examples of evolved psychological adaptations
  • Many studies devised to test these hypotheses – latest evidence suggests humans possess kin- detection mechanisms based on familiarity and similarity

Why do people do what they do? - From an evolutionary perspective

  • Humans possess evolved psychological mechanisms that interact with the environment to generate behaviours which evolved to help survival and reproduction. They may not always produce adaptive behaviour but we can predict how and when they break down