



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
used for my exam - good extra readings
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Lecture 2 Evolutionary Social Psychology: Justin Park
Parent caregiver attachment. Parental responses to child are kinship mechanisms e.g. mothers sensitivity to proximity seeking behaviours. Must provide secure base to allow child engage in non- attachment behaviours. RESULTS in differing attachment styles of infant e.g. secure, avoidant, ambivalent (anxious). Shapes relationships later on e.g. ambivalent-anxious tend to difficult forming secure romantic relationships, jealous tendencies, negative view of self. Avoidant are dismissive of relationships and mistrust individuals.
Then we have secondary attachments i.e. sibling attachments. If secure then healthy development. If do not make these attachments then maladaptive consequences including incest.
SECURE SIBLING ATTACHMENT – form of secondary attachment
INTRO
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
■ CE - However hard to generalise findings as Japanese, only 3 9 participants and mean age 21 years
INTRO: ATTRACTION TO FAMILIAR/SIMILAR
■ Based on these effects we'd expect siblings to be attracted to each other because they typically have similar: values, behaviour, beliefs and appearance
■ LIMIT OF SOCIAL APPROACH = cannot answer fundamental question- Why siblings are not sexually attracted to each other
Psychological adaptation: INCEST AVOIDANCE - ability to distinguish between close genetic kin and non-kin.
■ Such couples exhibit: lower fertility, more affairs, higher rates of divorce
■ (^) CE – correlational can’t infer cause and effect i.e. prolonged separation in childhood may not be sole cause of later sexual contact – could be due to many other variables. Plus self-report issues
EVIDENCE AGAINST EVOLVED INCEST AVOIDANCE: Pinker on Freud
Some argue presence of incest taboo around world = evidence people’s sexual desire for kin must be suppressed e.g. Freud: Oedipus complex desire to sex with parent. But it’s not like we were taught not to have sex with our siblings!
Pinker out ‘Freuded’ Freud in his response to Freud’s intimate erotic reaction to watching his mother change = Freud may have believed in incest because he was raised by a wet nurse: which may have reduced the kinship cues.
Fraley 2012 - FOUND: people find others more sexually attractive if they have just been subliminally exposed to an image of their opposite-sex parent. SUGGESTS: incest avoidance arises from consciously acknowledged taboos, and that when awareness of the kin relationship is bypassed, people find individuals who resemble their kin more sexually appealing.
Rantala 2013: FOUND: men - similarity to sibling in morphed images increased perceived attractiveness. Women rated faces that resemble their siblings as significantly lower in sexual attractiveness than morphed faces on average, and the opposite effect was found in SUGGESTS: sex differences as females bear greater costs associated with inbreeding depression, perhaps explaining their deeper aversion toward engagement in sexual activities with male individuals who bear cues to relatedness.
In sum
Why do people do what they do? - From an evolutionary perspective