

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A portion of a lecture note on algebraic geometry focusing on the concepts of presheaves, sheaves, and stalks. The definitions and properties of presheaves and sheaves on a topological space x, with examples of presheaves f1, f2, and f3. The document also discusses the concept of morphisms between presheaves and the relationship between presheaves and sheaves. The lecture note concludes with a definition of the stalk of a presheaf at a point and a lemma about morphisms between presheaves inducing morphisms on the stalks.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Algebraic Geometry Lecture 31 – Sheafification Joe Grant^1
Let X be a topological space.
Definition. A presheaf F of rings on X is:
(1) for every open subset U ⊆ X, a ring F(U ); (2) for every inclusion V ⊆ U a ring homomorphism ρU,V : F(U ) → F(V )
such that
(1) F(∅) = 0 (2) ρU,U = idF(U ) (3) W ⊆ V ⊆ U all open, then ρU,W = ρV,W ρU,V.
We call ρU,V the restriction maps, and for s ∈ F(U ) we sometimes write s |V for ρU,V (s). We call the elements of F(U ) the sections of F over U , and we sometimes write Γ(U, F) for F(U ).
Example. Let X = {x 1 , x 2 } with the discrete topology, i.e. all subsets are open. We write Xi = {xi}. We define some presheaves on X.
It’s easy to see that F 1 and F 2 are presheaves.
A sheaf is “a presheaf whose sections are determined by local data.”
Definition. A presheaf F on X is a sheaf if, for any open U ⊆ X, and any open covering {Vi} of U ,
(4) if, for s ∈ F(U ), s |Vi = 0, then s = 0; (5) if si ∈ F(Vi) such that for all i, j, si |Vi∩Vj = sj |Vi∩Vj , then there exists s ∈ F(U ) such that s |Vi = si for every i.
Note that (4) ⇒ the s in (5) is unique.
Example. • F 1 is not a sheaf because (4) fails: 2 ∈ F 1 (X), 2 |Xi = 0 for all i, but 2 6 = 0.
Example. Let
F 3 : F 3 (Xi) = Z (1 6 i 6 2) F 3 (X) = Z ⊕ Z ρX,X 1 = π 1 : Z ⊕ Z → Z : (m, n) 7 → m ρX,X 2 = π 2 : Z ⊕ Z → Z : (m, n) 7 → n.
Then F 3 is a sheaf. (We’ll see later that it’s a sheafification of F 2 .)
(^1) Typed by Lee Butler based on a talk by Joey G. 1
2
Definition. If F is a presheaf on X, and P ∈ X, then we define the stalk FP of F at P to be the direct limit of the rings F(U ) for all open U 3 P , via the restriction maps.
Unraveling this definition we see that an element of FP is represented by a pair 〈U, s〉 where U 3 P is open, s ∈ F(U ), and 〈U, s〉 ∼ 〈V, t〉
if and only if there exists some open set W ⊆ U ∩ V , P ∈ W , such that s |W = t |W. We call elements of FP germs of sections of F at the point P.
Example. As we have given X the discrete topology,
Fxi = F(Xi) (1 6 i 6 2)
and germs are just sections for F = F 1 , F 2 , F 3.
So the stalks here look uninteresting, but we’ll see later that we can still learn something from looking at them. Thinking of a sheaf as a (contravariant) functor F : Top(X)op^ → Rings
suggests the following definition.
Definition. If F, G are presheaves on X, a morphism ϕ : F → G consists of a ring homomorphism
ϕ(U ) : F(U ) → G(U )
for each open U such that whenever V ⊆ U is open, the diagram
F(U )
ϕ(U- ) G(U )
ρF U,V
? (^) ϕ(V )
ρG U,V
?
commutes. I.e. ρG U,V ϕ(U )(s) = ϕ(V )ρF U,V (s),
or “ρϕ = ϕρ”.
A morphism of sheaves is just a morphism of the underlying presheaves. An isomorphism is just a morphism with a two-sided inverse.
Lemma. For any P ∈ X, a morphism ϕ : F → G of presheaves on X induces morphisms ϕP : FP → GP on the stalks, sending
〈U, s〉 → 〈U, ϕ(U )(s)〉.
Proof. Suppose 〈U, s〉 ∼ 〈V, t〉. We want 〈U, ϕ(U )(s)〉 ∼ 〈V, ϕ(V )(t)〉. By definition of ∼ there exists W ⊆ U ∩ V , P ∈ W such that s |W = t |W. Then
ρG U,W (ϕ(U )(s)) = ϕ(W )ρF U,W (s) = ϕ(W )(s |W ) = ϕ(W )(t |W ) = ϕ(W )ρF V,W (t) = ρG V,W (ϕ(V )(t)).