Download 3. Assessment 3- Group presentation_sem2_20192020.doc and more Assignments English Language in PDF only on Docsity!
PBI1072 EPC Assessment 3: Marking scheme for Group Presentation (15%) Semester 1 2019/ Proposal Title: Name Matric No. Group No. Total Raw Scores Final Marks (15%)
Group Criteria (15 marks)
(5 marks) Topic Introduction
5-4- Interesting, confident and effective/relevant introduction of the proposal with relevant hook. Able to introduce outline well with credible statement. 3-2- Not very interesting and/or effective and/ or relevant introduction of the proposal. Outline was not clear.
1-0-Poor/ No topic Introduction
(5 marks) Body
5-4- Interesting, effective, and or relevant elaboration of the proposal. Description of the project, commitment, costs and impacts were clearly explained. 3-2- Not very interesting and/or effective and/ or relevant elaboration of the proposal. Description of the project, commitment, costs and impacts were briefly explained. 1-0- Irrelevant/ Poor elaboration of description of the project, commitment, costs and impacts.
(5 marks) Closing or Conclusion
5-4- Able to summarize / conclude the presentation 3-2- Divided/ have mixed conclusions. Conclusion was not clear. 1-0- Poor/ No conclusion TOTAL Individual Marking Criteria (17marks) S1 S2 S3 S4 S
Preparedness and Delivery (7 marks) 7-6 Presented confidently and fluently. Eye contact with the audience was consistently maintained. Professional mannerism was clearly demonstrated and maintained throughout the presentation. Able to present continuously though with occasional and unevenness. Minimal stumbling or groping for words. Maintained consistent eye contact with the audience. 5-4 Presented confidently and fluently. Eye contact with the participants was maintained almost all the time. Professional mannerism was maintained but not clearly demonstrated. Able to present continuously though with occasional and minor unevenness. Minimal stumbling or groping for words. 3-2 Presented quite confidently, although nervousness is quite visible. Eye contact with the audience was somewhat maintained. Professional mannerism was not clearly demonstrated and maintained. Moderately fluent, but able to keep presentation going although speech is sometimes uneven, hesitant and marked by some unsuccessful groping for words. 1-0 Able to present but lack of preparation is quite visible. Eye contact with the audience were irregularly maintained. Speech is frequently jerky, marked by many false starts. Professional mannerism was hardly demonstrated and maintained. The participants have to rely on key words and phrases to understand the presentation OR students who read from their notes (almost or all). Language Accuracy (7 marks) 7-6 Excellent command of the language with hardly any errors. Can use a variety of structures.
S1 S2 S3 S4 S
5-4 Good command of the language but with occasional minor errors. 3-2 Satisfactory command of the language. Some errors in structures but these do not hamper communication. 1-0 Limited command of the language- phrase /word level. Frequent errors in basic structures, meaning is impeded. Language Appropriateness (3 Marks) 3 - Choice of words is consistently appropriate/professional and relevant to the task given. Uncontextualised slang or colloquial words are not present.
S1 S2 S3 S4 S
2 - Choice of words is almost consistently appropriate/professional and quite relevant to the task given, with minor slips. Uncontextualised slang or colloquial words are minimally present. 1 - Choice of words is sometimes inappropriate/unprofessional and irrelevant to the task given. Uncontextualised slang or colloquial words are significantly present. Total raw marks : 32 marks (Convert to 15%)
